The business case for ESG continues to grow stronger. Organizations are recognizing that responsible governance, environmental awareness and social responsibility are no longer optional considerations.
Organizations that fail to prioritize their people, governance and environmental responsibilities may struggle to remain competitive in the years ahead.
If you missed it, you can read our blog on ESG and value creation. For now, let’s look at what the research tells us.
As part of long-term value creation, businesses are always searching for opportunities to increase profitability and maintain a competitive advantage.
However, rising legal requirements and growing expectations around transparency are changing how organizations approach business decisions.
Companies that adopt ESG frameworks are choosing a more structured and sustainable approach to long-term success.
Large organizations have already begun building ESG implementation roadmaps. Many smaller organizations are following the same path.
Those who delay action risk falling behind.
So why is ESG becoming such an important focus for businesses around the world?
Research conducted across the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom in 2021 found several key drivers behind ESG adoption.1
60% of companies surveyed said improved reputation was the most significant benefit of ESG adoption.2
Regulation (55%) and pressure from investors and customers (54%) were the main drivers behind ESG integration.3
Enhanced productivity, business growth and reduced operational costs were also widely reported benefits, cited by 38%, 37% and 36% of respondents respectively.
97% of organizations expect to see further benefits from stronger ESG performance.
Many organizations also anticipate operational improvements from stronger ESG strategies:
28% expect improved employee satisfaction
25% expect increased productivity
23% expect improved access to investment capital
22% expect reduced operational costs
These findings show that while ESG adoption may require initial investment, the long-term value can be significant.
“While ESG adoption may require upfront investment, the long-term benefits can be significant.”
Additional research reinforces this trend.
Organizations that demonstrate strong sustainability performance, trust and innovation outperform industry peers, showing 3.1% higher operating profits and stronger shareholder returns (Accenture).
Meanwhile, 83% of C-suite leaders and investment professionals believe ESG initiatives will contribute more shareholder value within five years (McKinsey Global Survey 2020).
Investment professionals also report that they would pay a median premium of 10% to acquire a company with a strong ESG track record compared to one with a negative record (McKinsey Global Survey 2020).
Changes in ESG expectations are already influencing how organizations operate.
Regardless of size or sector, companies are increasingly expected to act responsibly and demonstrate ethical business practices. Failing to do so can create social, environmental and economic risks that may affect long-term success.
While there is no universal ESG framework that fits every organization, businesses can focus on several practical priorities when building a sustainability strategy.
These include:
Organizations that engage meaningfully with sustainability often see broader benefits across their operations.
Today, an effective ESG strategy requires visibility into critical performance indicators such as:
Moving forward, collaboration between governments, businesses and communities will remain essential.
Shared responsibility will help organizations operate more responsibly while strengthening long-term business resilience.
“The collective efforts of policymakers, businesses and individuals must continue working together so organizations can act responsibly and build a more sustainable future.”
1 Online survey of 621 businesses (207 in each of the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom) conducted between Sept. 28 and Oct. 11, 2021 among senior managers responsible for ESG or sustainability programs.
2 Improved image with customers named by 46%; improved image with investors named by 33%.
3 Pressure from customers named by 36%; pressure from investors named by 42%.